http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4394
------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-07-10 10:21 ------- Others can correct me if I'm wrong, but it's not a general practice within SA to provide __subtests with no final tests. If I understand you correctly at this point, you want to provide "standardized" __subtests so that 3rd party systems like Barracuda, or custom rules files like Tim's, have something "standard" to use. However, on the assumption that the majority of SA sites won't use those 3rd party applications, by incorporating your __subtests, SA would be increasing the workload on ALL systems for the benefit of a minority. I believe that goes counter to this project's philosophy, which is to improve spam detection itself and to consume as few resources as possible while doing a good job at it. If you and Tim or others could submit a set of productive and effective rules that identify spam/outscatter, which use these __subtests, that would be a beneficial enhancement to the SA system. But without such positive results to be incorporated into SA itself, I don't see the devs accepting the overhead of these __subtests. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
