-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
Theo Van Dinter writes: > On Sat, Jul 09, 2005 at 10:14:18PM -0700, Dan Quinlan wrote: > > cycle has become so long. I'd like us to create a 3.2 branch for stable > > development focused on a release in 4 months (3 months development and 1 > > month for release): > > > > - new rules > > - a new set of scores and perceptron run not too long into future > > These can now easily be done with sa-update, and it can be done more > often than once every 3-4 months. ;) > > I'd rather see us focus on a stable 3.1, backport rules and do score > generation updates via sa-update, and leave new functionality for a 3.2 > release in the 3-4 month time frame. > > I've been wondering if splitting the rules into a subproject would > serve everyone better as well. Have that focus specifically on rules, > score generation, and the sa-update stuff, while those of us who enjoy > the code side of things can mainly focus on engine updates, etc, with > plugin writing going between the two. I think there may be more traction > getting new rules in place faster with more people involved if the two were > split, since people can write rules pretty easily but the engine takes some > getting used to. ;) +1. I definitely think this is worthwhile, and I think there's proving to be too much work, the current way. - --j. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Exmh CVS iD8DBQFC0xa5MJF5cimLx9ARAmeGAJ0dRB/LrmpIj5po1i9bsom19oAEgwCdFAbe nWmCIvL+LQcu6SIWd2P5xL4= =LYUf -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
