First, +1 on the general idea of facilitating rule submission by having a rules project.
Justin Mason wrote:
> I'd like to see if there's a way to combine the two somehow so that new
> SVN commits that update sandbox rules, are immediately mass-checked alone.
> However, I can't see a way to do that reliably from SVN commits alone,
> because (for example) meta rules may depend on other rules that were not
> changed as part of the same commit. So I think the "email with attached
> rules file" is still a better model.
Perhaps we could use SVN to check in rule submissions so they are version
controlled and tracked, and have emails refer to file paths and version
numbers instead of attaching the rules. Would that be too complex for the
people we want to attract compared to mailing in sets of rules as attachments?
-- Sidney Markowitz
http://www.sidney.com
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
