Saturday, July 23, 2005, 8:36:58 PM, Duncan wrote: DF> * We discussed at length the ideas for the new rules project, and we DF> came up with some ideas, which we're trying to track DF> http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/RulesProjectPlan (Please give us DF> your feedback)
Added to http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/RulesProjStreamlining : > TODO: criteria for overlap with existing rules? > BobMenschel: The method I used for weeding out SARE rules that > overlapped 3.0.0 rules, was to run a full mass-check with overlap > analysis, and throw away anything where the overlap is less than > 50%. Manually reviewing the remaining (significantly) overlapping > rules was fairly easy. The command I use is: perl ./overlap > ../rules/tested/$testfile.ham.log ../rules/tested/$testfile.spam.log > | grep -v mid= | awk ' NR == 1 { print } ; $2 + 0 == 1.000 && $3 + 0 > >= 0.500 { print } ' >../rules/tested/$testfile.overlap.out
