http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4505
------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-08-06 01:36 ------- I just noticed that the proposed 3.1 BAYES_* scores in scoreset 2 are identical to the 3.0 ones. So... manually tweaked scores for 3.0 should work just as good with 3.1. I'm +1 on the BAYES_50-99 scores I posted in comment 41 (which are the scoreset 2 scores copied to scoreset 3). I really think BAYES_99 should score at least 4.0. I'm not exactly sure which of Loren's scores Justin is referring to, but I think 3.5 is too low for BAYES_99. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
