Justin Mason wrote:
I don't get your point. As you describe it, the charset was correctly labeled and my charset normalization proposal would clearly do the right thing.FWIW, one spammer was doing this deliberately a while ago -- mailing entirely in ASCII characters, but declaring the charset as GB2312 (iirc), and including the odd chinese character towards the end of the mail. Since the latter charset includes the entirety of ASCII 0x00-0x7f, that worked for ASCII spam delivery.
