On Wed, Aug 31, 2005 at 08:07:31AM -1000, Warren Togami wrote: > This is not a spamassassin bug per-se, but rather a problem in the way > we had packaged it for years. > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=141323 > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=161785 > It would be helpful if upstream could look at the excellent explanation > in Bug #161785. I am hoping there is a better solution to this problem > than the suggested shell script .pid solution suggested in that bug. > > Wouldn't it be preferable to have a solution where spamd itself returns > when it is finished stopping rather than relying on an asynchronous kill > signal?
I think the solution is for spamd's --pidfile to write the pid to the file before dropping root, and this is fixed in 3.1.0. -- Duncan Findlay
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
