-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Duncan Findlay writes:
> On Mon, Sep 12, 2005 at 06:25:26PM -0700, Justin Mason wrote:
> > I think 4570 is the only relatively big one there -- and it was a
> > one-liner.  Given that, I think we could do the general release of 3.1.0,
> > instead of another RC.
> > 
> > Personally, I'd like to get 3.1.0 out.
> > 
> > Thoughts?
> 
> I'd be more in favour of 3.1.0 rc3, to get some last minute testing in
> before we release. (It'd be nice for 3.1.0 to be rock solid, so we
> don't need to release 3.1.1 right away...)
> 
> We've dragged the process on long enough that another couple days wont
> hurt.  :-)

depends on if you consider an early 3.1.1, as worse than an extremely late
3.1.0.  What are we at now, 6 months late? ;)

- --j.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Exmh CVS

iD8DBQFDJxJbMJF5cimLx9ARAuqyAKCCbfrVPuX49a/oh9vulEQpAgjEvgCeL9Sx
TB43mh09z8RNDenplIBCGc8=
=2DMY
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Reply via email to