-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
Theo Van Dinter writes: > On Fri, Oct 14, 2005 at 09:51:51AM -0700, Justin Mason wrote: > > couldn't/shouldn't you just use "make" instead of calling build/mkrules > > directly? (after all there may be other stuff that "make" builds.) > > I can see that argument. However, since it's never been necessary before, > and the only thing "make" would do for me right now is run "mkrules", > it's easier to just run mkrules manually. Though I suppose I could do: > > if [ -f Makefile ]; then > make distclean > /dev/null > fi > svn up > perl Makefile.PL < /dev/null > /dev/null > make > /dev/null > > which would generally work though the distclean complains a lot: > > $ make distclean > /dev/null > Not in MANIFEST: rules/10_default_prefs.cf > Not in MANIFEST: rules/20_advance_fee.cf > Not in MANIFEST: rules/20_body_tests.cf > Not in MANIFEST: rules/20_compensate.cf > Not in MANIFEST: rules/20_dnsbl_tests.cf > [...] > > I'm guessing that's a side issue with "distclean" not actually removing the > files under rules/ which is a bug imo. yeah, see my previous mail to dev a few days ago. I'll do it soonish, once everyone's had a chance to "rescue" their personalised rules files. "make clean" will have to rm -rf rules, essentially. - --j. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Exmh CVS iD8DBQFDUAVgMJF5cimLx9ARAjTEAJsFDL0pUF5k2uApLPDrWov9Rb2hDQCaAnWj NWvOJBPYOLB4yPMMjMZz3rs= =xOQg -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
