-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
Theo Van Dinter writes: > On Sun, Oct 16, 2005 at 12:29:35PM -0700, Justin Mason wrote: > > If this is still the case, why don't we just "take the plunge", sync up > > one final time, and switch over to the ASF one now? If there are bugs, > > well, we're not in a phase of development where a functional bugzilla is > > important, since we're in the "break stuff" development phase rather than > > the "keep it stable" pre-release phase. > > > > Kelsey has been asking after that machine for quite a while, it'd > > be nice to be able to give it back ;) > > I responded on the pmc@ list, since I included some private information > (username/passwords/etc). I'm all for moving forward on this, but basically > haven't been able to because of work taking up the vast majority of my time. > > One thing to note is that the BZ box does 3 things currently: > > - Bugzilla (pretty trivially moved) > - DNS (The ASF owns the spamassassin.org domain, but they still haven't taken > over the management/serving of the data) > - SMTP (All mail for @spamassassin.org goes there) > > The first is easy, the second is set to go IMO if some of the infra guys can > help out (I've kept the zones up to date, so the one in SVN ought to be right > for now), but we need to get slaves setup to serve the domain, then update the > root NS, etc. The third ... I don't know what we're planning to do with mail > for the domain. By in large, the addresses have been replaced with > @apache.org or @spamassassin.apache.org equivilents, but it'd be nice if we > could get some kind of virtualhost setup for the domain that we can control > for aliases and what not. Things like submit, release, and security still > potentially get traffic. Hmm. ok, we should note that down somewhere ;) adding to InfraNotes. > A thought may be that we should do all this stuff at ApacheCon US 2005. > A bunch of the infra guys will be there, as will I (that's the plan anyway), > so it should be easy to get this stuff done if we just sat down for an hour > and did it all. The time consuming bit of all this, imo, is the DNS > change-over for who serves up the zones. I asked the infra list a while ago > about DNS, then again about DNS for updates.sa.org, and basically never got a > response iirc. doh. Yeah, if we have to do anything with infrastructure help, it's not going to happen and there probably will be no movement there until at least ApacheCon; they are massively overloaded with their current workload, as far as I can see. - --j. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Exmh CVS iD8DBQFDUs9wMJF5cimLx9ARAkB2AJ9aKKgzGmgE9c/D8fm+PZnKg6TeegCgvfa7 YAboYilOQfCKKLgpW4uSiyg= =tp3g -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
