On Sun, Oct 16, 2005 at 12:19:35PM -0700, Justin Mason wrote: > ok, I can go for a new bugs@ list, too. +1
-0 I kinda doubt there's enough on dev@ to keep it going if we don't have bugs sent there. If we want to lower the traffic so that certain people can read what they need to read, then we should just create a dev-announce list or something like that for the important stuff. By creating a bugs@ list, we'll be splitting discussion of development (i.e. bug fixing) over two lists, which probably doesnt make much sense. -- Duncan Findlay
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
