On Dienstag, 8. November 2005 21:50 Duncan Findlay wrote:
> Anyways... it looks like the mechanism is pretty much set up... now
> all we need to do is write rules. (?) Anyone notice a lot more
> "clever" spam recently?

Thanks for your list of TODO. Hope that comes in the wiki soon - is it 
correct? Currently, I'm writing rules for *german language SPAM*, 
available via RulesDuJour ZMI_GERMAN.

Would the sandbox enable me to test my rules also with other peoples 
SPAM/HAM? I guess no, but that would be nice. I'd like to prevent FP, 
and currently I am very conservative about what text is considered 
SPAM. But some checks would be nice of course.

Anyway, some clear explanation about sandboxes would be nice.

mfg zmi
-- 
// Michael Monnerie, Ing.BSc  ---   it-management Michael Monnerie
// http://zmi.at           Tel: 0660/4156531          Linux 2.6.11
// PGP Key:   "lynx -source http://zmi.at/zmi2.asc | gpg --import"
// Fingerprint: EB93 ED8A 1DCD BB6C F952  F7F4 3911 B933 7054 5879
// Keyserver: www.keyserver.net                 Key-ID: 0x70545879

Attachment: pgpEc2Nf2iKrW.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to