http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=4689
------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-11-15 17:46 -------
Well, that does seem to explain why the rule got such a low score and S/O.
50_scores.cf:score HOT_NASTY 0.809 0 0.697 0.157
STATISTICS-set0.txt: 0.605 0.8035 0.1434 0.849 0.37 0.81 HOT_NASTY
STATISTICS-set1.txt: 0.641 0.8476 0.1600 0.841 0.37 0.04 HOT_NASTY
STATISTICS-set2.txt: 0.641 0.8476 0.1600 0.841 0.37 0.70 HOT_NASTY
STATISTICS-set3.txt: 0.583 0.7748 0.1356 0.851 0.36 0.16 HOT_NASTY
This debug line shows what's happening:
[11078] dbg: rules: ran body rule HOT_NASTY ======> got hit: "xxx.xxx"
That could be problematic for almost any censored IP address notation.
This rule should probably be split up into multiple rules, as the
/xxx\b.{0,9}\bxxx/ combination appears to be the troublemaker.
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
