On Tue, Nov 15, 2005 at 12:06:39PM -0800, Justin Mason wrote: > I've just updated http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/VotingProcedure > to fix a bug -- looks like we were reading the ASF pages wrongly. > quoting the fixed version: > > For code modifications, patches, and R-T-C changes to svn, committers have > the binding votes. However, for "ready to release" and project-procedural > ASF votes, votes must come from PMC members to be considered binding. > > (Note: previously committers could vote for releases, but this has had to > be changed, due to ASF regulations. While the Apache Voting page is a > little unclear on the subject, discussion on the 'legal-discuss' list has > made it clear that it is part of the ASF's bylaws that PMCs, and only > PMCs, can direct this action.)
Hmm... are "pre-releases" and "release candidates" different in this respect? Personally, I think requiring +3 from PMC for an RC or -pre is excessive. -- Duncan Findlay
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
