http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=4476





------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2005-12-02 06:50 -------
Not in my case.  I've only seen a single failure (at line 501) for each
(suddenly defunct) child and then nothing:


Nov 12 10:26:08 cyan spamd[21524]: prefork: child states: IB
Nov 12 10:26:09 cyan spamd[31065]: spamd: connection from smtp.film-tech.net
[66.98.221.156] at port 1039
Nov 12 10:26:17 cyan spamd[31065]: spamd: processing message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:501
Nov 12 10:26:31 cyan spamd[31065]: spamd: identified spam (44.1/5.0) for
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:501 in 22.4 seconds, 22303 bytes.
Nov 12 10:26:32 cyan spamd[31065]: spamd: result: Y 44 -
BAYES_99,...,URIBL_XS_SURBL
scantime=22.4,size=22303,[EMAIL PROTECTED],uid=501,
required_score=5.0,rhost=smtp.film-tech.net,raddr=66.98.221.156,rport=1039,mid=<[EMAIL
 PROTECTED]>,bayes=1,autolearn=spam

... lots of messages processed by child 18483 ...

Nov 12 10:53:52 cyan spamd[21524]: prefork: child states: II
Nov 12 10:54:05 cyan spamd[18483]: spamd: connection from cyan.dostech.net
[127.0.0.1] at port 39193
Nov 12 10:54:05 cyan spamd[18483]: spamd: processing message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:501
Nov 12 10:54:06 cyan spamd[18483]: spamd: identified spam (24.6/5.0) for
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:501 in 1.4 seconds, 3096 bytes.
Nov 12 10:54:06 cyan spamd[18483]: spamd: result: Y 24 -
BAYES_99,...,RCVD_IN_XBL
scantime=1.4,size=3096,[EMAIL 
PROTECTED],uid=501,required_score=5.0,rhost=cyan.dostech.net,raddr=127.0.0.1,rport=39193,mid=<[EMAIL
 PROTECTED]
et>,bayes=1,autolearn=spam

Nov 12 10:54:06 cyan spamd[21524]: prefork: child states: II
Nov 12 11:02:43 cyan spamd[18483]: prefork: sysread(8) failed after 300 secs at
/usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.3/Mail/SpamAssassin/SpamdForkScaling.pm lin
e 501.
Nov 12 11:02:44 cyan spamd[31065]: prefork: sysread(8) failed after 300 secs at
/usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.3/Mail/SpamAssassin/SpamdForkScaling.pm lin
e 501.




------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

Reply via email to