-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
Theo Van Dinter writes: > On Mon, Dec 05, 2005 at 11:06:50AM -0800, Justin Mason wrote: > > >when evaltests move to plugins, the object reference is not what it once > > >was > > > > oh crap. This may be a bad thing. > > > > Should we define a new API for plugins to define eval tests that uses the > > old, EvalTests-compatible argument order? > > I'm not really worried about it. Part of me would like to see us getting > rid of EvalTests and moving all to plugins. I haven't thought enough > about it to figure out if that's good or bad. agreed; all good as far as I can tell. EvalTests is a just a big old bad-smelling mess. tuits are the problem though. - --j. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Exmh CVS iD8DBQFDlMV2MJF5cimLx9ARArttAKCuvLUMi9gAWanymNvtLzV4nS7K0wCdG6GM +9I35B4mX6oNeyzHqn35yiE= =zN42 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
