-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
John Gardiner Myers writes: > Loren Wilton wrote: > > > Others have suggested adding new basic rule types with plugins, which is > > > >probably not a terrible idea. But on the other hand, I'd suggest that > >cleaning up internal structure as necessary to make it easy to add new types > >internally might be a better long-term investment. > > > I've added new basic rule types with a plugin; it was relatively > straightforward using the existing interfaces. Agreed that adding new rule types is *doable*, if not exactly intuitive. I've done it in the URIBL code, by simply adding eval rules on the fly, and that seems to work OK. It'd be nice to have a more intuitive method, though. > The one area that could > use work is in providing the default score. how so? do you mean having a score of != 1.0, by default? - --j. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Exmh CVS iD8DBQFDuw6wMJF5cimLx9ARAv9bAJsGUiTG8SJkqLGCpSaAntOmg2mrkgCdEC4/ JrSw69mgXsDp9G/fC8JgDnk= =OBRd -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
