I appreciated this idea because it is not worth to check spam mail after certain marks; as it will speed up Spamassassin.
Deepak Mahajan -----Original Message----- From: Theo Van Dinter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, February 01, 2006 1:10 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: Spamassassin / Spamd speedup On Tue, Jan 31, 2006 at 08:26:38PM +0100, Gabriel Maria Plutzar / Alpha NetWork wrote: > So it would be good to define a "maximum mail score" - if defined, scanning > of a mail is aborted after that score is reached. So, for example a system, > which is configured to throw away mails with more than 15 points could stop > doing scan after reaching them, eventually skipping costly rbl checks. [...] > Perhaps this idea can find a way into future releases You've described short-circuiting. There's a discussion and what-not in BZ 3109: http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=3109 RBL checks, btw, are actually really lightweight and can be done in the background. :) -- Randomly Generated Tagline: your belt may fail your suspenders may fail if you're really serious about keeping your pants up, use both! - http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=79658&cid=7036985
