On Fri, Feb 03, 2006 at 10:58:21AM -0800, John Myers wrote: > Related to bug 4776, I propose a necessary requirement before creating a > new plugin interface that at least two plugins implementing that > interface exist and be intended for production use. The null > implementation (no plugin of that type registered) could count for one > of these implementations. A non-contributed, proprietary plugin could > similarly count for one implementation.
That's fine with me; though it'd be nice to see at least two open source ones. :-) If someone is going to the effort of pluginizing something, chances are that there exists a plugin other than the default. In bug 4776, the default would be the current behaviour, wouldn't it? So the requirement would only require one other implementation, which I presume must exist. -- Duncan Findlay
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
