http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=4811
------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-02-28 02:29 ------- (In reply to comment #1) > I'm inclined to say no, the primary reason being [...] Yeah, I'm -1 on this. Falling back bypasses the whole purpose of using this in the first place. By definition, this rule should only ever hit if there's an SPF record. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
