Daniel Quinlan writes: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Justin Mason) writes: > >> As for the rule updates... Here's my thought. I propose we have the > >> rule updates be C-T-R to start. If that doesn't work out, we can change > >> to R-T-C easily. If no one vetos this proposal by 00:00 GMT on 2/28, > >> we'll take it as the initial policy for the rulesrc area. > > > > +1. There's no way Dan will notice this, since I don't think > > he reads the dev list anymore ;) > > -1 veto > > I don't think we can do this safely. > > Just kidding.
ha! > +0 is my real vote on this one ok, sounds good. --j.
