On 10/03/06 05:01 AM, Justin Mason wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Author: dos
Date: Thu Mar 9 19:28:58 2006
New Revision: 384691
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=384691&view=rev
Log:
sandbox: add my SIQ plugin for anyone who's interested
insomnia == non-engineered, messy code :(
This plugin executes SIQ queries in the background and allows the data
returned by the reputation service provider to be tested via a number of evals
and a psuedo-header
wow, awesome!
have you got any results you can share? is it good? ;)
--j.
Well, it's worked for the last month. I guess that's a good result. :)
I haven't done more than look over the results in the maillog (running
spamd with -Dsiq). They appear to be good, but I don't have any
numbers. A rep score of 1, especially when combined with a high
stability value (see meta tests), seems to be highly accurate.
BTW, the scores are pulled out of thin air. They haven't caused me any
problems, but they're not based on anything other than I know a rep
score of 0 or 1 should score higher than a rep score of 100, etc.
Daryl
