http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=4507
------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-03-14 16:48 ------- (In reply to comment #17) > I am -0.998 against deploying this rule sans a perceptron scoring run. The FP > rate is not to be triffled with and there is a lot of overlap with the SURBL > rules. I'm concerned that any SURBL false positive will then instantly become > a message false positive (assuming URIBL.com black is more aggressive) when it > hits both lists. A few thoughts: These rules are already deployed via 3.1.1 updates. The scores for the URIBL_* rules aren't any more important than the scores for any rules we're making available. Right now, I've been guessing at scores based on hit frequency results, but we need to come up with a better way to set the default scores. The subject of this ticket is about adding in URIBL* rules, which has been done, so we should move to another venue (dev@ is suggested) to discuss how to better set default scores/do more frequent score generation. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
