http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=4828
------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-03-17 00:13 ------- Daryl, is it possible and valid to have unparseable relays before the Received header for last internal relay? I just realized that I may have read the dccifd man page wrong. It says '[...]are taken from the first Received header if it has the standard "name (name [IP address])..." format (or N+first if there are N rcvd-nxt options)' That means that it will not work if it doesn't see the correct header. I guess that's what you are saying: The mail at some site may go through different paths under different circumstances, with different numbers of internal servers. Perhaps it might be better to explicitly pass dcifd the client and HELO options? Does the plugin have access to those values? That way there would be no need to mess with the number of Received headers to skip. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
