Bas Zoetekouw writes: > Hi Justin! > > You wrote: > > > Is there any way the script could be run 2 hours earlier? Or even 1 > > hr 20 minutes earlier? ;) That way it would fall under the correct > > "day" in the UTC timezone. > > What about just tagging the revision at 0:00 UTC? Wouldn't that just > solve all problems?
no -- it's not the tag-time that matters; it's the time that the mass-check started at, expressed in the UTC timezone. Because the "zmi" mass-check happens *after* 0000 UTC, it shows up as being in the next "day" period. --j.
