Theo Van Dinter writes: > On Wed, May 24, 2006 at 11:35:18PM -0500, Michael Parker wrote: > > I fear that the warning is going to lead to a HUGE support headache. We > > either need to override the userstate dir for all the tests, add an > > additional possible userstate dir that will for sure exist or turn that > > warn into a dbg. > > Ok, I changed the warn() to an info(), since the userstate_dir isn't > required to exist anyway. > > I'm cancelling this vote and we'll vote again with the new tarballs.
fwiw, a long term fix would be option (b) -- tests should not be using the user's "real" userstate dir. --j.
