http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=4347
------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-07-12 09:30 ------- +1 on 3574. The DIGEST_MULTIPLE case: meta DIGEST_MULTIPLE RAZOR2_CHECK + DCC_CHECK + PYZOR_CHECK > 1 where RAZOR2_CHECK, DCC_CHECK, PYZOR_CHECK could all be defined by unloaded plugins means that we should not make this an error or visible by default, I agree. A possible way around that would be if we could add a new config setting that indicated "RAZOR2_CHECK is a valid rule name, although it's not currently defined, so do not issue missing-meta-dependency warnings about it". That would allow 3448. But I don't think there's any hurry to do that... unless Loren fancies coding it up ;) ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
