http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=4778
------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-07-20 17:24 ------- Notes from a meeting between Michael Parker, Danial Quinlan, and myself: * Rule type plugins will return code for evaluating the test and calling got_hit. check will concatenate and eval this returned code, much like the existing do_*_tests code does. * Rule type plugins can store information in the PerMsgStatus. * We want to reduce the effect that user tests have on the whole mechanism (if not remove support for user tests entirely). This may require restrictions such as prohibiting user tests from having the same name as system rules. * The "required head/body points" part of autolearn will require rule type plugins to declare whether each test is header/body. Is this facility of autolear needed? * To simplify the rules mechanism, the "only_these_rules" feature of mass-check can probably be reimplemented to assign zero scores to those rules it doesn't want. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
