Theo Van Dinter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [19-07-2006 21:46]:
> On Wed, Jul 19, 2006 at 09:38:54PM +0200, Radoslaw Zielinski wrote:
>>   # These are the non-standard required modules
>>   # Use the evals to avoid the annoying RPM requirement check
>>   eval { use Net::DNS; };
[...]
>> Would someone bother to enlighten me: why break a dependency generator,
>> when it works exactly as intended?
> The problem is that sa-update, and therefore the modules that are solely
> required by sa-update, are optional.  We don't want the spamassassin RPM to
> require perl(Archive::Tar), perl(IO::Zlib), etc.

> Arguably, sa-update could be made into its own RPM, and therefore have its own
> requirement list, but we haven't done that.

Bug #5003.

> Related is the problem of our
> package names versus distribution's package names, and places like RedHat
> "Obsolete"ing our packages because they want it done a different way, etc.

It's RH's problem, if a problem at all.  This *.spec is optional, after
all...

-- 
Radosław Zieliński <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Attachment: pgpvygkNKJbh5.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to