http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=4347
------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-08-02 21:04 ------- 'Aug 2 16:44:46 master spamd[7290]: rules: meta test DIGEST_MULTIPLE has undefined dependency 'DCC_CHECK' I understand the reasoning for this change, but it is not good that messages like this appear by default in a user's logs. Users will think this is an error, and it will forever be a cause for concern and a waste of time for both users and support persons.' totally agreed; even if it might seem logical, the amount of *work* it'd generate in spurious errors and warnings would be massive. I think the best fix (as I said above) is to provide a new setting that indicates "DCC_CHECK is a valid rule name, even though it may be undefined for various reasons"; then if DCC_CHECK appears in a meta declaration, it won't generate this warning. something like "tflags DCC_CHECK exists" maybe? ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
