http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=4603
------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-09-07 23:09 ------- (In reply to comment #13) > > spamd: if the SA developers are positive about it, I'll patch it to use > > Mail::SpamAssassin::Spamd and Mail::SpamAssassin::Spamd::Config. > I'm definitely positive on that general plan, and I think the other > committers are too. Then it will be done. > In general, much of spamd should be abstracted out into modules in the > Mail::SpamAssassin:: namespace. In particular, all the stuff that deals with > wierd stuff like vpopmail should be implemented as OO modules, or plugins, > implementing those mechanisms, instead of being in the monolithic spamd > script. vpopmail... How about removing every single reference to it, followed by svn ci -m 'rm vpopmail, get a real MTA'? > (Much of that can't be shared with Apache-spamd anyway, though, since it often > requires setuid'ing and I don't think apache-spamd does that?) No it doesn't. Not possible without really ugly hacks. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
