Theo Van Dinter wrote: > Thoughts? (happily, I was able to shrink the list of 3500 unparsed relays > down to ~50 unique formats) >
Not many but I will toss out an idea that I like to promote every now and then. It sure would be nice if we could come up with some sort of syntax that we could define various received header layouts. Then they could just be part of the ruleset and updated whenever a new one is found. Possibly not doable, but interesting none the less. Michael
