On Tue, Oct 03, 2006 at 08:24:10PM -0400, Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote: > As for who should have access to the zones box... (sort of related) I'm > a little concerned about what kind of oversight we are required (by the > ASF) to have over rule updates. If we need three PMC +1s for a release, > what do we need for rule updates? I suppose you could argue that
As far as I know, the ASF has no opinion on the rule updates and so it's up to the PMC. At last check, we decided that updates were CTR, and actually doing an update doesn't require a vote -- especially since updates for trunk are automatic. > they're just config files, but the rules are a pretty big component of > the product. In any case, there has only been 2 commits (one of which > was the addition of a "1;") in the last 6+ months from all 5 committers > combined, so it's definitely not a pressing issue. Um. Where were you looking? I haven't been doing a ton of updates, but it's more than 2 in 6 months. > Anyway, the 3.1.6 queue is empty now, except for bug 5044. I just want > to make sure that you weren't reserving exit code 2 for anything before > I commit the sa-update lint changes. Geez, you guys cleared it out without me. <sniff> I think 2 is probably fine, though the description is incorrect (or misleading anyway): +An exit code of C<2> means that a lint check of the current site config failed. It means that linting of a channel failed. It could have been the site config, or it could have been the channel. There's no way to differentiate. -- Randomly Selected Tagline: You will be honored for contributing your time and skill to a worthy cause.
pgp6o0qMVAvor.pgp
Description: PGP signature
