http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=3991
------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-11-10 14:13 ------- What t/spamd_ssl.t and the way I run spamd have in common is that they use --ssl and --port arguments to spamd. My guess from the comments in the patch is that specifying --ssl and --port without specifying --ssl-port in interpreted to mean open both plain and ssl sockets and to use --port for the value of --ssl-port. For backwards compatibility, --ssl --port=n should mean that only an ssl socket is opened. I think a good way of handling it would be to test if the port and ssl-port are equal once they are decided on, and if they are not open a non-ssl socket. If the command line explicitly says --port=n --ssl-port=n that could trigger a warning, but I don't think it has to be an error. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
