http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5187
------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-11-27 06:52 -------
Here are the current results.
0.00000 37.2752 0.0123 1.000 0.99 0.00 RCVD_IN_XBL
0.00000 21.3403 0.0144 0.999 0.96 0.01 T_E_RCVD_IN_XBL
0.00000 21.3403 0.0144 0.999 0.96 0.01 T_RCVD_IN_XBL
0.00000 2.4869 0.0041 0.998 0.88 0.00 RCVD_IN_SBL
0.00000 1.8986 0.0082 0.996 0.85 0.00 T_RCVD_IN_ZENXBL
0.00000 1.4006 0.0041 0.997 0.85 0.00 T_RCVD_IN_ZENSBL
0.00000 27.0548 0.2362 0.991 0.77 (n/a) __RCVD_IN_ZEN
0.00000 27.0416 0.2382 0.991 0.77 (n/a) __RCVD_IN_SBL_XBL
This is odd. T_RCVD_IN_ZENXBL and T_RCVD_IN_ZENSBL are coming out
quite badly here.
The code looks like it should only result in *more* hits for ZENXBL:
header T_RCVD_IN_ZENXBL eval:check_rbl('zen-notfirsthop',
'zen.spamhaus.org.', '127.0.0.[45678]')
header RCVD_IN_XBL eval:check_rbl('sblxbl-notfirsthop',
'sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org.', '127.0.0.[456]')
I have a theory: I think the drop-off is because RCVD_IN_XBL and RCVD_IN_SBL
are using #reused results, whereas T_RCVD_IN_ZEN[SX]BL do not. If you look at
the "by contributor" data, this looks likely; compare the net-bb-* results,
which don't use #reuse, to some of the others:
http://ruleqa.spamassassin.org/20061125-r479108-n/%2FRCVD_IN_(ZEN%7CSBL%7CXBL)/detail#all
0.00000 6.5471 0.1378 0.979 0.86 0.00 RCVD_IN_SBL net-bb-fredt
0.00000 6.5338 0.1378 0.979 0.86 0.00 T_RCVD_IN_ZENSBL net-bb-fredt
0.00000 1.6660 0.0000 1.000 0.81 0.00 RCVD_IN_SBL net-theo
0.00000 0.0005 0.0000 1.000 0.41 0.00 T_RCVD_IN_ZENSBL net-theo
in other words, I need to do a standalone mass-check with --reuse
turned *off* to get a useful comparison of this data.
also: Theo -- looks like you need to look at the resolver on that
machine ;)
finally: no sign of the PBL. odd.
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
