On Mon, 27 Nov 2006, Justin Mason wrote: > > >> Also, I believe that a lot of legitimate messages (from Microsoft MUAs) > >> contain NULs, typically at the end of attachments. Therefore my servers > >> strip NULs rather than rejecting them. Insert usual rant about the quality > >> of standards conformance in legitimage email :-( > > > >At the end of attachments in terms of the raw or encoded version? So far: > > > > 1.138 1.3665 0.0016 0.999 0.87 1.00 NULL_IN_BODY > > > >which works for me. I don't think they're common in any meaningful way. > > nice results there!
Hmm, now I can't remember why I decided to strip nulls rather than reject them when I did that part of our config two years ago. A look at today's collection of offenders shows that they are indeed all spam and do not (as I had thought) come from MUAs inside our network. Thanks for pointing that out :-) Tony. -- f.a.n.finch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://dotat.at/ VIKING NORTH UTSIRE SOUTH UTSIRE: SOUTHERLY 6 TO GALE 8, PERHAPS SEVERE GALE 9 LATER. ROUGH OR VERY ROUGH. OCCASIONAL RAIN. MODERATE OR GOOD.
