Theo Van Dinter writes: > On Tue, Jan 02, 2007 at 02:33:32AM -0500, Theo Van Dinter wrote: > > This is my main issue with the automatic updates btw. I currently don't > > like > > the idea of the nightly/weekly results enabling/disabling rules and changing > > scores (though it doesn't do that yet iirc) on production-use updates. > > Oh, another main issue which I've brought up before is that given the > current setup, unless things have changed that I've missed, is the > automated rule updates only work for the current _development_ release. So > we'd need to retool things to work properly for the last (and probably > previous couple) stable releases.
Yeah -- I think what we came up with was that we'd keep the ruleqa/automatic-update-building infrastructure going, as it currently is, for 3.2.0, after that became the maintainance branch. Then create a new separate parallel infrastructure for the new dev trunk. --j.
