http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=4252
------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-01-05 16:17 ------- (In reply to comment #3) > number of other related bits of information. This seems like a nice idea, but > in the real world, it'd be hard to mass-check this rule!! Actually it would be rather trivial to mass-check that kind of thing. We care when the message was received (there's a Util function to determine this) not what the current time is, and you can even have mass-check replay the messages in order which we currently do for Bayes. Note: the default nightly/weekly runs don't both running messages in order since it doesn't matter for the current non-Bayes rules. > Is this ticket worth keeping open? Bob admits his day job is more important > than SA at the moment, in the future we could always reopen it? It may be worth testing, but I have a feeling it's not going to provide a usable ham/spam distinction. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
