http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5292
------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-01-12 14:59 ------- (In reply to comment #4) > a weird one: > "He told me.well.in fact, he didn't say much" matches well.in (why is the html > code containing me...well... but the dots vanished from the txt version? a bug > in hotmail composer I suppose). > For the latest case what about validating www. when there's no http:// ? I > don't > think MUAs make links of non http nor www. uris. The issue is spam that says "type gotofoo.com in your browser" ... we're trying to catch that. What this comes down to is: - do we limit ourselves to www.* strings? - do we limit ourselves to old-school TLDs? (.com, .net, etc.) - do we limit ourselves to obvious URLs only (https?://) - do we not bother and have people complain that we don't catch this type of thing? ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
