Doc Schneider writes: > Theo Van Dinter wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 23, 2007 at 06:46:57PM -0600, Doc Schneider wrote: > >> I just noticed something the pre1 tarball release has no masses > >> directory. Ugh. Sort of hard to masscheck without that isn't it? > >> > >> There is one in svn, though. > > > > Yes and no. There's nothing that says we have to provide a tarball to use > > for > > mass-checks, nor that if a tarball is provided that it has to be the output > > of > > "make dist". :) > > > > It was generally decided that since the masses directory is really only used > > for development, there was no point in sucking up space in the distro > > tarball > > with it since those people can just rsync or svn to get it. > > > > Ok... But I had thought this pre release was going to be for masschecks > only. Sorry to get all shocked about it. I do pull the svn down a few > times a day, usually, so do have it there. 8*)
Yeah, this tarball is just for wider testing; the one we'll use for mass-checks will be a match to whatever SVN is like on that day. However, I hadn't spotted that this change was going to make the mass-check preparations more complicated. :( Previously, we just made a tarball for people to mass-check with, using "make dist"; this now won't work since it won't include masses. Instead, I'll generate a tarball from "svn export". --j.