If it did take overlap into account, I'd be curious. I thought it didn't...
--j. Loren Wilton writes: > Bob had a technique that worked reasonably well, and only required some > minor human thought to usually come up with good numbers. I'm pretty sure > that it took overlap into account. (Although the overlap runs may have been > something he did manually, I don't recall.) > > He seems to be gone to other places now, but I'm pretty sure he left a > description of how his masscheck and score generation worked someplace > around here, probably in the archives of the newsgroup. > > I think it would be worth looking into, since it didn't require much more > than some slightly modified masscheck tools, as best I recall. > > Loren
