http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5270
------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-02-17 12:20 ------- (In reply to comment #20) > please take a look at 50_scores.cf and see if you can spot any > issues. Regarding the RCVD_IN_DNSWL_* rules (disclaimer: I'm involved with the dnswl.org project): 1) RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI does not have a score. Could it be because it only has very few samples in my corpus and most likely not very many in other peoples' corpora? Would it make sense to add a score for _HI? 2) RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW received a better score (-0.698) than RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED (-0.498). This seems counter-intuitive, since *_LOW contains servers which may also emit a certain amount of spam. Would it make sense to leave the scores at -1, -4 and -8 as Theo had them in his sandbox? http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/spamassassin/rules/trunk/sandbox/felicity/70_dnswl.cf?view=markup (As a reminder: the LOW, MED and HI indicate the trustworthiness assigned to a particular source.) ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
