http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5374
------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-03-19 19:15 ------- > And yet, unless you are a SORBS-using moron of a MTA-admin, you will not > deny these forwarder's traffic at the front door, because your own > customers have hosted (and mail-forwarded) accounts there. Exactly. See: http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5373 For some suggestions on helping with this case with other RBLs as well. I didn't really see any comment about my main assertion which is: > > I think there should be a pretty much global switch to enable/disable these > > dynablock/dul type lists that people can change if they are sure their > > system > > conforms to the above requirements Basically as I mentioned, there's a number of preconditions your system must have before using any of the DUL type RBLs (see points 1-3 in my original post) and I think a lot of systems wouldn't meet those preconditions, so I think having some way to easily disable all DUL type RBLs is a good idea, and probably should be the case by default? Rob ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
