Sidney Markowitz wrote: > Doc Schneider wrote, On 12/4/07 9:41 AM: >> Not too sure if things will need to be double built so the new spamd and >> will talk to the new spamc but will figure that out. > > Yes it does, as spamd has to run in its own perl environment and it own > SpamAssassin build under Cygwin, or on any other machine you have handy. > I think I documented what environment variables or option to Makefile.PL > or make test (I forget which) you need to get the spamc tests to use an > external spamd.
The documentation for using spamd from a cygwin session is in the README.win file. I have not built it yet to set. Just did nmake and got the normal SA to build cleanly under ActivePerl. And one thing is that modules like Mail::DKIM And Mail::DomainKeys also Encode::Detect refuse to build on ActivePerl. I may be missing some SSL mods and haven't checked in ppg yet to see if they're available for AP. > The only advantages of using Cygwin are 1) You can do it on localhost > with no need for another machine; and 2) If you are testing the Win32 > build you may want to be testing a Cygwin build anyway, so you already > have the Cygwin build of SpamAssassin available. Guess it did make sense for me to install Cygwin then. 8*) So two two two buildbots in one eh? HAR! > By the way, once you verify that this works could you update > spamc/README.win to refer to Visual C 2005 Express and its download > location instead of Visual C++ Toolkit 2003? > > -- sidney Trust me I'll fix that README.win !! Still trying to grab all the environment variables needed. I may commit a building.win.bat file to SVN just to make life easier on someone wanting this to work. -- -Doc Penguins: Do it on the ice. 8:44am up 4 days, 16:55, 17 users, load average: 0.18, 0.30, 0.37 SARE HQ http://www.rulesemporium.com/
