Justin Mason wrote:
> Doc Schneider writes:
>> Justin Mason wrote:
>>> rc2 seems pretty solid. I suggest if this keeps up 'til tomorrow, we
>>> should put it out as 3.2.0-beta1?
>>>
>>> The remaining bugs in the 3.2.0 queue are:
>>>
>>> 4834 nor P3 NEW Patch: SA 3.1.1 "make test" fails
>>> in jail on FreeBSD 5.2.1-RELEASE
>>> 4481 nor P5 NEW if ($@) { dbg constructs *should*
>>> report the value of $@
>>> 5420 nor P5 NEW DnsResolver.pm fails when new()
>>> returns EACCES
>>>
>>> These 3 are trivial in scale. However I'd prefer not to apply them unless
>>> we run into another serious bug which requires another rc tarball; any
>>> change can cause problems at this stage ;) They could all wait for 3.2.1
>>> in my opinion.
>>>
>>>
>>> 5412 min P5 NEW deferable spamc -x -R always
>>> returns zero
>>> 5419 min P5 ASSI deferable kill -HUP `pidof
>>> spamd` causes the ps name to change from "spamd" to "perl"
>>>
>>> These we can safely leave for 3.2.1, I think.
>>>
>>> --j.
>> I still am trying to have 3.2.0 running on Win32 do: perl Makefile.PL &&
>> make && make test for buildbot so far getting tons of errors. Cygwin
>> builds fine. It has to include a whole bunch of different enviroment
>> variables--thinking I could add them into my system settings? Anyway...
>>
>> Not sure if this is a show stopper for releasing 3.2.0 but thought I'd
>> mention it. I'm in contact with someone who uses SA on a Win2003 server
>> and I think he will be helpful in tracking down what is happening.
>
> Well, we're kind of in a hurry at this stage ;)
>
> I'd be inclined to release 3.2.0 without passing native-win32 tests, and
> possibly with the win32 MISSING_HB_SEP bug -- purely because we can't
> hold it up too much waiting for them to be investigated.
>
> --j.
Well I can relate to getting this out the door. So I'm also
a go on the plan.
+1
--
-Doc
Penguins: Do it on the ice.
8:44am up 4 days, 16:55, 17 users, load average: 0.18, 0.30, 0.37
SARE HQ http://www.rulesemporium.com/
