http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5258
------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-04-28 14:48 -------
(In reply to comment #8)
> Maybe could use a doubled asterisk for the glob(*): FOO_**_BAR. As long as
> exponentiation doesn't use this the syntax should be clear. I'm not sure
> that
> trick works nearly as well if you are using a glob(?) also, since it can
> become
> inobvious how many characters you are talking about: FOO??????_BAR.
Interesting idea. I still prefer rules_matching("FOO_*_BAR") to FOO_**_BAR,
though.
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
