-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Sidney Markowitz wrote: > As another data point on the DNS thing, I just ran make test under MacOS > on the proposed 3.2.0 release. As I have seen before, running it cold > does result in t/dnsbl.t failures, then running it again (presumably > with some DNS information in a cache) passes all tests. This is not the > complete and consistent failures in both dnsbl and dnsbl_sc_meta I am > seeing under Windows, but may be related. > > t/dnsbl..................... Not found: P_7 = > <dns:134.88.73.210.sb.dnsbltest.spamassassin.org?type=TXT> > t/dnsbl.....................ok 1/23# Failed test 2 in t/SATest.pm at > line 633 > t/dnsbl.....................NOK 2/23 Not found: P_17 = > DNSBL_SB_FLOAT > # Failed test 9 in t/SATest.pm at line 633 fail #2 > Not found: P_18 = DNSBL_SB_STR > # Failed test 10 in t/SATest.pm at line 633 fail #3 > Not found: P_16 = DNSBL_SB_TIME > # Failed test 11 in t/SATest.pm at line 633 fail #4 > Output can be examined in: log/d.dns/1 > t/dnsbl.....................FAILED tests 2, 9-11 > > Failed 4/23 tests, 82.61% okay > t/dnsbl_sc_meta.............ok > > -- sidney
I was having this same problem and had to change my /etc/resolv.conf file to point the first nameserver to an actual server. Mine was pointing to my router for some reason. I think it had to do with one of my NICs doing DHCP and not static. Might want to check out that on your MAC OS X and see. - -Doc - -- -Doc Penguins: Do it on the ice. 8:44am up 4 days, 16:55, 17 users, load average: 0.18, 0.30, 0.37 SARE HQ http://www.rulesemporium.com/ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with CentOS - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFGN5lNqOEeBwEpgcsRArz+AJ4o2gexDE+bHIHbOpvFdSnvRAcbggCePzIz cUFTgOZo7n2a0vnWdsIWC+o= =WJZx -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
