Michael Parker writes: > > build/README used the "b3_x_0" format. if "3.2" was more appropriate, we > > should have updated the procedure docs... :( > > > > Hmm that doesn't make it right, I think breaking from what was already > established is a bad idea. I'd vote for going ahead and recreating the > branch in the right place and removing this. > I'd be happy to update any README files that are misguided.
ok, I think I've fixed it in most places -- feel free to take a look for others... --j.
