Tony Finch writes: > I install SpamAssassin and the libraries it needs separately from the > system perl so that I can have parallel installs of different versions. > This leads to the tests failing because they run spamassassin.raw rather > than the generated spamassassin which has had the library paths > substituted. Is there a reason that the raw version is run rather than the > substituted one?
if I recall correctly, I think the idea is that it'll use the rules from ../rules and the libs from ../lib, instead of the installed system rules in /usr/share/spamassassin or /var/lib/spamassassin and the installed libs from /usr/lib/perl5 (or wherever). It's tricky to support all the combinations. --j.
