Daryl C. W. O'Shea writes: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Author: jm > > Date: Sat May 5 05:35:44 2007 > > New Revision: 535514 > > > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=535514 > > Log: > > create temporary copies of the log files we process, to avoid race > > conditions where rsyncd uploads a new rev which we then think is data from > > an OLD rev > > > > Modified: > > spamassassin/trunk/masses/rule-qa/corpus-hourly > > This or one of the revisions up to r535536 (I haven't looked at them) > seems to have made things worse. > > Sunday's active.list had a lot of rules, including all the new sandbox > rules, removed from it and (probably related) at the moment ruleqa is > only showing logs from "bb-doc jm" for r535586. I see logs from the > usual submitters for this rev on the server: > > ham-bb-doc.log ham-bb-jm.log ham-daf.log ham-jm.log > spam-bb-doc.log spam-bb-jm.log spam-daf.log spam-jm.log > ham-bb-fredt.log ham-bb-zmi.log ham-dos.log ham-theo.log > spam-bb-fredt.log spam-bb-zmi.log spam-dos.log spam-theo.log
Seems to have caught up now: http://ruleqa.spamassassin.org/20070506-r535586-n 20070506-r535586-n (Viewing) bb-doc bb-fredt bb-jm bb-zmi cthielen daf dos jm theo zmi [+] opening the "+" reveals: ham-bb-doc.log: started: 20070506T091115Z; submitted: 20070506T093735Z; size: 312 bytes ham-bb-fredt.log: started: 20070506T151915Z; submitted: 20070506T155143Z; size: 1087394 bytes ham-bb-jm.log: started: 20070506T093837Z; submitted: 20070506T151806Z; size: 16238640 bytes ham-bb-zmi.log: started: 20070506T155254Z; submitted: 20070506T162713Z; size: 312 bytes ham-cthielen.log: started: 20070506T122735Z; submitted: 20070506T133053Z; size: 4391688 bytes ham-daf.log: started: 20070506T091025Z; submitted: 20070506T135423Z; size: 6665678 bytes ham-dos.log: started: 20070506T090019Z; submitted: 20070506T212556Z; size: 494917 bytes ham-jm.log: started: 20070506T090634Z; submitted: 20070506T123108Z; size: 9187465 bytes ham-theo.log: started: 20070506T091159Z; submitted: 20070506T174450Z; size: 52540352 bytes ham-zmi.log: started: 20070506T225258Z; submitted: 20070507T012813Z; size: 4016708 bytes spam-bb-doc.log: started: 20070506T091115Z; submitted: 20070506T093736Z; size: 13392838 bytes spam-bb-fredt.log: started: 20070506T151915Z; submitted: 20070506T155146Z; size: 15182533 bytes spam-bb-jm.log: started: 20070506T093837Z; submitted: 20070506T151812Z; size: 28963175 bytes spam-bb-zmi.log: started: 20070506T155254Z; submitted: 20070506T162715Z; size: 14949375 bytes spam-cthielen.log: started: 20070506T122735Z; submitted: 20070506T133053Z; size: 307706 bytes spam-daf.log: started: 20070506T091025Z; submitted: 20070506T135535Z; size: 46882451 bytes spam-dos.log: started: 20070506T090019Z; submitted: 20070506T213308Z; size: 147063429 bytes spam-jm.log: started: 20070506T090634Z; submitted: 20070506T123146Z; size: 15913065 bytes spam-theo.log: started: 20070506T091159Z; submitted: 20070506T174738Z; size: 406172209 bytes spam-zmi.log: started: 20070506T225258Z; submitted: 20070507T012819Z; size: 14755129 bytes Was that it? was it transient (which happens if there's too little CPU for too many logs), or are there still issues? --j.
